World Webcast War III

There is a large hat conspicuously on the table as CTN’s managing director, Stephen Watson, presents the results of our third annual webcasting survey. Last year, when just 74 out of the FTSE 250 were using streaming media, he promised, ‘I’ll eat my hat if the number of FTSE 250 webcasts doesn’t jump dramatically during the next year.’ With the revelation that the number has fallen to 64, Watson starts chomping on his sombrero.

Watson surmises the fall in usage is due to bad market conditions that have caused smaller companies to ‘rein in’ their IR activities and resist new technology.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that the number of FTSE 100 companies using streaming media has risen from 83 to 90, confirming the webcast as an established and proven IR tool. For the first time CTN (Simplywebcast has lately adopted the brand of its parent CTN, which produces interactive and video communications for companies) looked at the FTSE Eurotop 100. It found the continent following closely in the footsteps of the UK, with 83 of the companies in the index currently webcasting.

As for the big news, according to CTN’s Richard Coope, whose eyes are still swimming from his webcast trawl, ‘Broadband and interactive Q&A have leapt ahead. Institutions are operating in a broadband environment; it’s their tool of choice. And now it’s the norm for companies to offer a high bandwidth connection for their webcasts.’

The survey shows 62 FTSE 100 companies offering the broadband option, compared to just 25 last year. Watson sees broadband coming into its own with future online operating & financial reviews (OFR, which is UK equivalent of MD&A): ‘Companies are committing to broadband now but a lot of the value will really be in the broadband environment of the future.’

CTN uncovered only four webcast AGMs in the UK, in contrast with 27 in the Eurotop 100 (note that there is overlap between the FTSE 100 and the Eurotop 100). But with the spread of online voting there might come the day when companies are obliged to webcast the sometimes unruly annual event. Consider GlaxoSmithKline’s May event, which featured vocal criticism of executive remuneration. The pharmaceuticals giant opted not to webcast but CTN believes streaming media could have served GSK well. ‘It was actually quite a good meeting,’ Watson remarks. ‘However, it looked chaotic on the evening news. A webcast could have told the real story.’

Behind the scenes some big companies are ‘trialing’ AGM webcasts. BP, for example, has considered it for the past two years and may webcast its AGM in 2004 in tandem with the introduction of online voting.

Critical criteria

CTN’s Nathan Oxley studied the whole universe of FTSE 100, FTSE 250 and Eurotop 100 web sites between April 21 and May 23. Two new criteria were added to the 32 from our surveys in 2001 and 2002: whether webcasts are available in a format for downloading to a palm-top computer (so far Vodafone seems to be the only company with this feature); and evidence of interactivity like e-mail questions (only five companies with interactivity were identified – all of them from continental Europe).

Among the FTSE 100, CTN generally found the same non-webcasters as last year. These included Morrisons (‘just don’t want our mugs on telly’) and Canary Wharf (which prefers investors come in person and see what they’re investing in). BOC Group is a newcomer to this band of recalcitrant webcasters, having stopped the practice over the past year.

Continental European companies have their own challenges to face in terms of language differences. Many offer simultaneous translation, but not necessarily to good effect. The best webcasts give the viewer or listener a choice but the worst give you both languages at once. Continental companies haven’t taken to the CEO interview yet, with only seven of the Eurotop 100 featuring it versus 23 of the FTSE 100.

Considering how hot CSR is as an issue, it is surprising that only two companies in the survey produce any webcasts supporting their CSR policies. ‘Does this reveal a discrepancy between the commitments companies say they’re making to CSR and the commitments themselves?’ Watson wonders.

CTN, along with CSR consultancy Futerra, recently studied how UK companies are communicating CSR online. Their conclusion is ‘slowly’. There is also a strange inverse correlation in the level of communications: ‘Some companies with strong records in CSR are doing the worst job of communicating. Conversely, some of the worst corporate citizens make a big song and dance about CSR on their web sites,’ Watson says. Among the FTSE 100, only 48 companies have a CSR report online, including 36 that make it useful and engaging with some form of interaction for readers.

While clearly disappointed with some of the survey results (and his headwear lunch), Watson nonetheless says there’s been good progress among large companies, particularly in continental Europe. ‘People used to see webcasting as a substitute for face-to-face meetings,’ he remarks. ‘But now the archive is very important, too.’

Does webcasting help companies live up to the spirit of full, open and honest communications that is now demanded of them? On the surface, yes. But consider that just 51 companies out of the FTSE 100 include the Q&A on the webcast, leaving the other 39 open to accusations of selective disclosure. Eurotop 100 companies are slightly better here, with 62 companies putting the Q&A online. Smaller companies are awful, with just eleven of the 69 webcasting FTSE 250 companies archiving the Q&A on the web. In fact, while the technology is willing, the spirit is weak.

Webcast Streams (%)

  FTSE 100 FTSE 250 Eurotop 100
  2001 2002 2003 2002 2003 2003
Companies with streaming media 47 83 90 30 28 83
Video webcasts 39 64 64 19 16 66
Broadband option 23 25 62 14 11 59

Critical picks
Reuters’ prelim results
Reuters has a webcast micro-site with different formats, bandwidth options and ‘help’ available. The webcast itself has a large, high-quality video display and a drop-down index for agenda and Q&A. The whole package is integrated into the design of Reuters’ IR web site and has a ‘clear, engaging layout.’

BP’s location report videos
These archived webcasts show how BP looks from far-flung points of view, providing a good complement to the usual material on an IR web site. The videos themselves are simple to use and accessible, with links to related information and footage. Other good examples of companies using webcasting not just for earnings results but for other IR-related information include CSR videos by BAT and RBS.

Swisscom’s AGM webcast
Swisscom presents a clear, large image with a high standard of production. The micro-site includes options for downloading the slides and a drop-down menu showing the agenda.

Deutsche Post’s analyst conference
With a large picture and large, clear charts, Deutsche Post uses webcasting to good advantage. The webcast follows the branding of the main web site and viewers can choose to listen and view slides in German or English. There is an automatic, pop-up feedback page, too.

International Power’s prelim results
A high quality image, download options and a good index make International Power’s webcast a strong one.

SkyPharma’s prelim results
The production values of SkyPharma’s webcast are high and the material cleanly and clearly displayed.

Quantitative questions
1. Is streaming media being used?

2. What type of webcasting is being used?
(video/audio/synchronized & downloadable slides, PDA)

3. In what area is it being used?
(IR, product, communications)

4. For what reason is it used?
(results briefings, annual meetings, investor events)

5. Which formats are offered?
(RealPlayer, Windows Media Player, Quicktime)

6. What connection speeds are offered?
(standard, fast/broadband)

7. What registration facility is offered?
(online registration, e-mail address required)

8. Is Q&A included in webcast?
(Q&A available, indexed Q&A)

9. What additional features are available?
(CEO interviews, speaker biographies, downloads, specific content for retail investors, indexed highlights, feedback facilities, interactivity)

Qualitative questions
1. Webcast accessibility
Is the webcast easy to access and find?
Is the webcast easy to navigate with clear functionality?
Is this an effective online facility?

2. Webcasting production values
Does the webcast have good picture quality?
Does the webcast have good sound quality?
Is the quality of the actual webcast of a high standard?
3. Design and brand experience
Is the webcast effectively integrated into the web site design?
Does the webcast add to the company’s online presentation?
Does the webcast reflect the company’s brand values?

The top

FTSE 100 % score Eurotop 100 % score FTSE 250 % score
BAE Systems 84 BAE Systems 84 International Power 74
Barclays 84 Swisscom 84 Dimension Data Holdings 71
Abbey National 81 Barclays 84 Balfour Beatty 68
BP 81 Abbey National 81 SkyePharma 68
Centrica 81 BP 81 ARM Holdings 65
Reuters Group 81 Credit Suisse Group 81 Britannic Group 65
Vodafone 81 Deutsche Post 81 Pilkington 65
Aviva 77 Vodafone 74 RMC Group 65
Kingfisher 77 Aviva 77 Rolls-Royce 65
Reed Elsevier 77 Royal Bank Of Scotland Group 77 United Business Media 65
Royal Bank Of Scotland Group 77 SAP 77 Aegis Group 61
Alliance & Leicester 74 St Gobain 77 British Vita 61
Friends Provident 74 Aventis 74 EMI Group 61
Smith & Nephew 74 Bayer 74 IMI 61
  Novartis 74  
  Swiss Reinsurance 74  
  UBS 74  

The bottom

FTSE 100 % score Eurotop 100 % score FTSE 250 % score
HSBC 23 HSBC 23 Galen Holdings 23
BG Group 32 Telecom Italia 29 Amlin 29
Emap 35 Enel 32 Cox Insurance Holdings 29
Kelda Group 35 Nokia 35 Intermediate
Capital Group
29
GKN 45 Ahold 39 Luminar 29
Johnson Matthey 45 Roche 39 William Hill 29
Rentokil Initial 45 Endesa 42 Capital Radio 32
Unilever 45 L’Oréal 45 Acambis 35
WPP Group 45 Unilever 45 National Express Group 35
Whitbread 48 Dexia 48 Securities Trust
of Scotland
35
    Munich Re 48 Matalan 39
    Telefonica 48    
    Volkswagen 48    
    Zurich Financial Services 48    

Upcoming events

  • Forum – AI & Technology Europe
    Thursday, March 12, 2026

    Forum – AI & Technology Europe

    About the event Stay ahead. Harness AI. Transform IR. In today’s rapidly evolving financial landscape, AI is transforming how IROs engage with investors, analyze market sentiment and deliver insights. Yet, many IR teams face challenges in understanding and employing these tools effectively. WHEN WHERE America Square Conference Centre, London The…

    London, UK
  • Think Tank – West Coast
    Thursday, March 19, 2026

    Think Tank – West Coast

    Our unique format – Exclusively for in-house IRO’s The IR Impact Think Tank – West Coast will take place on Thursday, March 19, 2026 in Palo Alto and is an  invitation-only event exclusively for senior IR officers. Our think tanks are free to attend and our unique format enables participants to network extensively, and discuss, debate and dissect…

    Palo Alto, US
  • Awards – US
    Wednesday, March 25, 2026

    Awards – US

    About the event The IR Impact Awards – US will take place on Wednesday, March 25, 2026 in New York. This very special event honors excellence in the investor relations profession across the US. WHEN WHERE Cipriani 25 Broadway, New York Celebrating IR excellence Since the annual event first launched…

    New York, US

Explore

Andy White, Freelance WordPress Developer London