US companies question pay ratio rule

Most companies listed on US stock exchanges question the relevance of impending rules that will govern CEO pay ratios, with only one in 10 believing the required disclosure will provide important information, according to a Towers Watson poll.

More than half the companies that responded – 56 percent – say they would be concerned about complying with the new transparency requirements set out by the SEC last month. The regulator voted in favor of a new rule that will require listed companies to reveal the ratio their CEO’s pay to the average compensation received by all other employees. The change comes as part of a set of reforms required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Most of those concerned about the new rules suggest that gathering pay data would be a time-consuming and expensive process, while others express worries about how to determine a data sample and to identify a ‘mean employee’ for comparison.

Only 31 percent say they are most concerned about how their firm’s CEO-to-worker ratio will compare with that of their peers, their industry or even the entire marketplace. Fewer still – 21 percent – cite any difficulty in explaining the ratio to shareholders as a chief concern.

‘Determining the best approach to identifying the median employee and calculating a pay ratio will be no easy task, especially for large global companies. There’s a lot of uncertainty about what this will cost,’ says Todd Lippincott, Towers Watson’s North American leader of executive compensation.

Lippincott also notes that only two in 10 respondents say they fully understand the costs, effort and data needed to comply with the new rules. The poll finds that just over a third of those polled think they will be ‘comfortable’ they have the necessary tools to deal with the new disclosure requirement, expected to be implemented in 2015.

‘Companies will need to spend time to figure out what the costs will be so they can provide meaningful estimates in their comments to the SEC,’ suggests Lippincott. ‘The companies we have been meeting with are beginning to get their arms around the proposed rule and the work that will be required to comply, even though most don’t believe it will provide important information for investors.

‘While the flexibility the SEC provided in calculating a pay ratio is helpful, companies will need to decide on an approach that’s valid and defensible, because they know many stakeholders will be taking a close look at these disclosures.’

Upcoming events

  • Briefing – Lessons from the 2025 Proxy Season
    Tuesday, July 22, 2025

    Briefing – Lessons from the 2025 Proxy Season

    In partnership with WHEN 8.00 am PT / 11.00 am ET / 4.00 pm BST / 5.00 pm CET DURATION 45 minutes About the event The 2025 proxy season was influenced by several key issues, including changes announced in Staff Legal Bulletin 14M regarding the interpretation of Rule 14a-8, and…

    Online
  • Briefing – Effective earnings preparation amid macro volatility
    Thursday, August 07, 2025

    Briefing – Effective earnings preparation amid macro volatility

    In partnership with WHEN 8.00 am PT / 11.00 am ET / 4.00 pm BST / 5.00 pm CET DURATION 45 minutes About the event Amid constant tariff news, geopolitical upheaval and other developments stemming from the new US administration, IR teams have their work cut out as they prepare…

    Online
  • IR Impact Forum – AI & Technology
    Wednesday, November 12, 2025

    IR Impact Forum – AI & Technology

    About the event As more investors and corporate communication teams embrace AI, machine learning and emerging technologies to inform their decision-making, investor relations professionals are facing a pivotal moment: adapt and lead, or risk falling behind. At this early but fast-moving stage of adoption, IR teams are asking important questions…

    New York, US

Explore

Andy White, Freelance WordPress Developer London