Glass Lewis mulls move to counter proxy access evasion

Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis is considering recommending that shareholders vote against board candidates when a company counters a shareholder proposal for proxy access with its own ‘diluted alternative’, according to media reports.

The possible policy change, disclosed by Glass Lewis in an email to the Wall Street Journal, would represent an escalation in the proxy adviser’s push for proxy access. The move would basically threaten to punish companies through negative votes if they seek to block shareholder-submitted proposals that ‘conflict’ with the companies’ own.

The vote against management-backed candidates would likely apply when companies present a ‘conflicting proposal’, or counter-proposal, that Glass Lewis determines is meant to offset and weaken a proxy access proposal by shareholders.

‘Glass Lewis will evaluate the reasonableness and rationale of a company’s response to a proxy access shareholder proposal, including when the company submits an alternative access proposal and excludes the shareholder proposal, based on the differences in the terms of the proposals as well as analysis of the company, its governance, performance, board independence and responsiveness to shareholders,’ the firm says in its note to the WSJ.

The notice comes a week after Mary Jo White, chairman of the SEC, said she ordered her staff to study possible changes to its policies regarding conflicting proposals.

‘Proxy rules enable shareholders to submit proposals for inclusion in a company’s proxy materials for a vote at a shareholder meeting, subject to certain procedural and substantive exclusions,’ White said in a statement on January 19. ‘One of the exclusions, Exchange Act Rule 14a-8(i)(9), allows a company to exclude a shareholder proposal that directly conflicts with a management proposal. Due to questions that have arisen about the proper scope and application of Rule 14a-8(i)(9), I have directed the staff to review the rule and report to the commission on its review.’

She added, however, that the SEC will ‘express no views’ on the rule in the current proxy season.

Upcoming events

  • Briefing – Earnings in 2026: Keeping your story consistent under market scrutiny
    Wednesday, October 22, 2025

    Briefing – Earnings in 2026: Keeping your story consistent under market scrutiny

    In partnership with WHEN 8.00 am PT / 11.00 am ET / 4.00 pm BST / 5.00 pm CET DURATION 45 minutes About the event With investors and analysts consulting an increasing volume of data sources to inform their investment decisions – as well as using AI to enhance their…

    Online
  • Briefing – Making your 2026 investor meetings count
    Thursday, October 30, 2025

    Briefing – Making your 2026 investor meetings count

    In partnership with WHEN 8.00 am PT / 11.00 am ET / 3.00 pm GMT / 4.00 pm CET DURATION 45 minutes About the event After a year of rapid technological advancements and significant macroeconomic change, it’s more important than ever for IR teams to maximize the impact of their…

    Online
  • Corporate Governance Awards
    Thursday, November 06, 2025

    Corporate Governance Awards

    About the event WHEN WHERE VENUE_ADDRESS Awards by nomination Categories Awards by research Categories What our attendees say IR Rankings – LOCATION The IR Rankings – LOCATION report is the ultimate benchmarking resource for any IRO looking to improve their IR program. It provides detailed analysis and statistics on the…

    New York, US

Explore

Andy White, Freelance WordPress Developer London