Elon Musk
-
From shareholder to managerial capitalism: how proxy firm regulation and 14a-8 reform will define IR in 2026
In October 2025, Tesla CEO Elon Musk deployed provocative language characterizing proxy advisors as ‘corporate terrorists’ following ISS’s recommendation that shareholders reject his proposed $1 trn compensation package. Musk argued that ISS and Glass Lewis ‘have no actual ownership themselves’ yet effectively control corporate governance outcomes through their recommendations to investors. This identifies a genuine agency problem: proxy advisors bear no economic consequences from their recommendations.
-
Tesla: How do you get support for a $1 trn pay package? Give shareholders a slice of the pie
ISS is recommending against Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 tn compensation package. Glass Lewis too. CalPERS and NBIM, manager of the world’s most valuable sovereign wealth fund, have each come out publicly against. But with the Tesla AGM happening today online and at Tesla’s Gigafactory Texas, one small, family-run proxy advisory firm – whose ESG-skeptic voting guidelines are offered by ISS, and which boasted the $57 bn Texas Permanent School Fund as the first state fund to sign up – is backing Musk’s compensation. ‘We’re strongly focused on the alignment of incentives,’ says Jerry Bowyer, CEO of Bowyer Research, who…